The wordle
created as a class using 15 word phrases that we each associated with STEMS2
brought forth various words. Like the
differences and similarities in our perspectives of STEMS2, as educators we
must be certain that our stem unit plans not only assess our student’s
understandings but also assess the way in which we deliver lessons to
students.
In essence,
the formative assessment is a self-check for an educator to figure our where to
guide the flow of the lesson as different things may come up or the approach
for student comprehension might not be happening. A summative assessment would be a way to
evaluate student understanding at the end of the unit and hopefully with
formative assessments along the way, the unit was a success for increasing student
knowledge. These are just some aspects
of things to be aware of when trying to approach education with a multiple
lens.
In
designing a rubric for a STEMS unit plan via the "wordle" the key
concepts that would be important to get across in a STEMS unit is the
development of multiple lenses as well as collaboration/multiple connections
amongst student perspectives and social circles. Community engagement and place based history
comprehension/sense of place is another group of concepts that would be objectives
for student comprehension. The rubric
will also guide students as to where within each objective should a student be
performing in order to meet the minimum of the lesson and what is considered
quality work.
|
Criteria
|
Acceptable
|
Target
|
Beyond
|
|
Multiple lenses
|
Student is able to identify two different disciplines of
education within a lesson and explain the interconnectivity.
|
Student is able to identify 3-4 disciplines of education
within a lesson and explain the interconnectivity.
|
Student is able to identify 5+ disciplines of education
within a lesson and explain the interconnectivity.
|
|
Collaboration
/Multiple connections with others
|
Student is able to follow directions and work together in
a group comfortably, expressing respect and openness to complete a task.
|
Student takes the initiative to begin work together in a
group and comfortably applies others perspectives to complete the task.
|
Student shows ability to lead group work that honors all
perspectives and creates increased unity amongst peers.
|
|
Community
Engagement
|
Student has set up interviews with family members and
community stakeholders to understand community need and wants.
|
Student has conducted interviews and has followed up by
putting together an event or completed a project to help with the needs and
wants of community.
|
Student has taken lessons and has presented findings at a
community event/meeting.
|
|
Place
Base History/Sense of place
|
Student is familiar with the place-based information of
his/her educational site, example: names of land divisions, mountains,
streams, rain and wind etc. Respect towards environment is expressed.
|
Student is familiar with the place in which they call
home. They can identify names and characteristics unique to educational site
and their home base. Respect and increased land stewardship is expressed.
|
Student is familiar with multiple areas within their
community and can perform cultural practices unique to the area and
environmental methods to best support a sustainable and healthy environment
and community.
|
Hi Pua! I really like how detailed your rubric is. I think the only questions I would have is how would you like for your students to express their knowledge of respect towards the land for place base history/sense of place? Would they be verbally telling you, or writing it down? The reason why I ask is because I was unsure of how to implement that in my classroom, and I know the kids have GLO's and their personal standards in the classroom, but I am not sure if these standards pertain to respecting the land as well. I like how positive your rubric is! I like how you focus on all of what the students can do, and not what they cannot do. :o)
ReplyDelete